Age of Abundance in Hadith and Elon Musk

 These economists are completely wrong in objecting UHI, or better still Age of Abundance. With robots designing and making better and better robots, labour cost is zero, so prices for services will be zero. Electricity is also zero because solar energy is zero. All materials also have zero cost because they are recycled using zero labour and energy costs. The result is super deflation, so no need for income to survive. However, you need a strong government to allow this age of abundance to occur, because humans have no incentive to manufacture or sell any more. The transition is the tricky part, especially given the wrong economic opinions that you presented. In a super deflation, capital has zero value. Can you verify and comnent.





Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Muhammad Proved a Better General than Khalid at Uhud

Image
  Historymache took a very simplistic analysis of the battle of Uhud which does not make sense. The Meccans simply gave up in finding that Prophet Muhammad was dead. They did not proceed to march to Medina. Remember the Meccans consisted of 3000 infantry, 200 cavalry. While the Muslims consist of only 700 infantry, with only 100 wearing chain armour. 300 went back to Medina. The Muslim accounts showed that the Meccans finally knew that Prophet Muhammad survived, but they still retreated because Prophet Muhammad was able to retreat on the hill slopes. The retreating Muslims also gathered to the hills, which made sense because if they stayed at the plains, they would be slaughtered by Khalid's cavalry. Also, based on interviews with the Meccans who later converted to Islam, they revealed that they were all wounded and tired, so thought that they cannot beat the remnants of the Muslim army which was placed at the hills at that moment. They also feared that there would be reinforcement...
Read more

Violations of Malaysia Agreement 1963

Image
I just realised that the review paragraph (9) does not apply to duties on petroleum products. Only those related to 40% portion but the petroleum duties stand. The published reason for denying Sabah because of health services surrendered to Malaya is also nonsense. Whoever has allowed the removal of these duties are liable for damages and Malayan government must pay all past dues plus interests and penalties. In the review, sub para 9, only subpara 6,7, 8 are subject to review. The others don't, especially sub para 2 for the petroleum duties. No wonder Sarawak got it but Sabah stupid do not bother. Stupidity is not a defence. All government servants that are responsible for violating this portion of the agreement are liable for damages.
Read more